Escolha uma Página

Third, it opens a strategic door to your own candidate for chancellor.

The “” New Germany “”, however, headlines: “” Thank you, China “” and “” Karlelujah “”. Instead, the leading organ of the Left prefers to criticize the cross on the dome of the Berlin Humboldt Forum as a “” Christian gesture of reflection “”. Source: “More and more countries are rejecting the migration pact. In Germany it is becoming a political bomb. Now the UN migration commissioner is taking action She wants to help Angela Merkel – but the opposite could happen. The UN migration pact is becoming a political rift in Europe.

At first, only the USA rejected the migration-friendly treaty, but now numerous countries from Australia to Estonia have followed suit. A vehement rejection front is forming within Europe. After Austria, Hungary, Poland, Bulgaria and the Czech Republic now also consider the migration pact to be intolerable.

Norway, Denmark and Croatia are likely to follow. Italy, Great Britain and Sweden fluctuate. Israel, China, Japan and South Korea are also unlikely to ratify. “” A momentum has arisen that more and more states want to reject it.

German secret diplomacy “fails”, says a high-ranking EU diplomat. The migration pact is supposed to be adopted at a summit meeting on December 10th and 11th in Morocco.

But the success of this summit is becoming more and more questionable. Louise Arbor (Photo: picture alliance / Monika Skolim) Because criticism is growing in this country too. In the beginning it was only the AfD that polemicized against the pact (it was about a “” resettlement program “” that “passed the Bundestag”) and mobilized, now the circle of rejection is growing daily. The Free Voters – recently the ruling party in Bavaria – spoke out at a party conference against signing the migration pact. Federal Board member Tobias Gotthardt criticizes the pact “” with numerous design flaws. The distinction between migrant workers and asylum seekers is too unclear.

In addition, the conduct of negotiations by the federal government without the participation of parliament and citizens on such a central topic is unacceptable. For the critics, the UN migration pact sends the message that mass immigration should be legalized and facilitated. In the Union, there is rumbling in several regional associations. Saxony-Anhalt's CDU was the first state association to officially oppose the pact at a party congress.

The majority of the CDU delegates voted at the weekend to call on the federal government to reject the pact. The supporters of the application included the newly elected CDU state chief and interior minister Holger Stahlknecht and general secretary Sven Schulze. With the German signature on the contract, there is a risk of being compelled to open the gates unconditionally, the state parliament member Lars-Jörn Zimmer justified his application.biology essay help service

Stahlknecht spoke of a “” yellow card for the federal government “”. The pact was negotiated completely under the radar of the public. Neither the CDU nor the population could have taken a position on this. Jens Spahn, who is behind in the candidate race for the CDU chairmanship, also senses the atmosphere at the base.

He compares the topic with the failed TTIP debate, wants to discuss it at the party congress and brings a postponement of German approval into play. He receives support from the parliamentary group vice-president and CDU middle-class leader Carsten Linnemann. Should both get away with it, it would be a disgrace for Angela Merkel. Spahn has already defeated Merkel once at a party congress with the one-two decision.

The migration pact is now a welcome opportunity for him to get his sluggish presidency election campaign going. “” Large parts of the Union reject the thing. We are concerned that the AfD will outclass us in the European elections, “explains a CDU member of the Bundestag from the Spahn camp. Angela Merkel senses the growing resistance and is fighting ever more vehemently for the pact. One ally is Louise Arbor, UN special envoy for international migration. Arbor is currently busily giving interviews to soothe the growing criticism in Germany and Switzerland.

After all, the desire for the pact had come from here. In an interview with the weekly newspaper “” Die Zeit “” she admits: “” The initiative for this came from Europe after the European crisis in 2015. “” Now Union politicians are wondering who in the federal government started this initiative? The Chancellery and the Foreign Ministry would have given inappropriately on this issue. In fact, the federal government apparently had the lead behind the scenes of the pact from the beginning.

Under the chairmanship of Germany and Morocco, diplomats, politicians and various interest groups met in 2017 and 2018 at several events of the “” Global Forum on Migration and Development “”. With the help of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the GFMD was instrumental in formulating the Marrakech paper. On its website it declares the summit in Morocco to be the “” high point “” of the “” global migration community “” in order to establish “” general principles and legally enforceable obligations “” of migration. “” Enforceable liability “” is exactly what the critics of the migration pact assume as the long-term goal of the pact. Arbour, on the other hand, proclaims: “” The pact is not a contract, so it is not legally binding. “” But why should it exist then if it shouldn't have a formal effect? Legally non-binding agreements are often incorporated into international law. A prominent example is the Paris Climate Agreement.

Arbor replied to the critics: “” This pact does not promote migration, it does not aim to reduce or increase migration. He does not say that migration is good or bad. “” Then why does his preamble explicitly refer to migration as a source of wealth and innovation? When asked, Arbor explains: “” Because it is the truth. “” As the tone in the pact debate is becoming sharper, Arbor is also formulating increasingly more aggressively. Arbor believes that countries that do not wish to sign the pact have either “” misunderstood the text or are insincere “”.

In doing so, Arbor defamed its critics and entire countries such as the USA, Austria or Australia as fools or liars. The agitatory tone is no coincidence. Because Louise Arbor is not only regarded as the “” mother of the migration pact “”, she is also a passionate, political activist. For decades she has been pursuing politics on the subject of minorities and international law from a left-wing liberal stance; her political opponents like to call her “” Comrade Louise “”, comrade Louise.

As the Commissioner for Human Rights of the United Nations, she regularly attacked US foreign policy, as well as Israel and Canada’s own government, which allegedly does too little for indigenous people. Arbor also put herself in political nettles when she welcomed the Arab Charter of Human Rights, which unilaterally accused Israel of racism and sought to “” eliminate “” Zionism. It was only after strong criticism from Western states that Arbor distanced himself from some of the statements made in this declaration.

But Arbor earned great, cross-party respect as chief prosecutor of the tribunals on the genocide in Rwanda and the crimes during the Yugoslav wars. Now she is on the European opinion stages to enable Angela Merkel to legitimize her migration policy. But it could be that it only drives Merkel deeper into political problems.

Jens Spahn should hope so. Source: “Markus Söder basks in rising poll numbers. Now he's going on the offensive on climate issues. He thinks strategically. There could be a black-green federal government in 2021. There are three in the courtyard garden of the Bavarian State Chancellery Bee colonies moved in.

Markus Söder welcomed them personally and presented a corresponding “flower strip” to the press in the park. The green leafy photos are intended to demonstrate all of Germany: Söder is now Germany's newest climate friend. Greener than the greens.

Because Bavaria's Prime Minister presents – while Berlin is slumbering in the political summer break – a rather ambitious climate protection program. Baeder with a tree in the garden of the State Chancellery (Photo: picture alliance / dpa) It reads like the Greens Christmas wish list in the middle of summer. The surprising package of measures of the greened CSU chairman ranges from legal milestones (climate protection in the Basic Law and in Bavaria's state constitution) to solid mass greening (more than 30 million new trees are to be planted in Bavaria). Bavaria should become climate-neutral even sooner than the federal government. Even the smallest ecological orders are suddenly issued in rows. The State Chancellery is immediately supplied with 100 percent green electricity. The fleet of government and agencies will radically dispense with internal combustion engines.

Train tickets are to become cheaper thanks to a lower VAT rate, a comprehensive species protection law has been passed, Bavaria is littered with biotopes and orchards, wild-flowered margins bloom on fields, forests, paths and streams, there should be more organic food, more insect protection and even reduced land consumption. Söder has cleverly planned his green offensive, staged it with a bang in the media and delivered the appropriately pathetic wording: “” We are facing a task of the century, so we need a treaty of the century. “” Political friends and enemies rub their eyes. Ironically, the CSU overtakes all of Berlin's politics on the green verge. Söder's calculation is threefold: Firstly, he wants to finally regain the authority to interpret a mega-topic for the Union. The CSU is reluctant to run politics on the defensive.

Söder is thus repeating a strategic success mechanism of his predecessors. Decades ago they also opted for an offensive, employee-friendly course on the social issue (often to the chagrin of the economic wing of the Union) and thus thematically almost expropriated the SPD in Bavaria. For decades, the workers in Bavaria have felt in good hands with the socio-politically profiled CSU.

Now Söder is trying to do the same with the ecologically minded bourgeoisie in the metropolises. Sigmar Gabriel once described the CSU's systematic embracing strategy as follows: “This makes them the last real people's party in Germany.” “Second, Söder wants to finally slow down the upswing of the Greens. The strong results of the Greens in the European elections have set the alarm bells ringing in Munich.

One must put a stop to the green option for chancellor – ideally through objective government solutions. In addition to the power of interpretation, creative power must be demonstrated. “” Greens are know-it-alls, we are do-it-yourselfers “” is the new guiding principle of the CSU. Third, it opens a strategic door to your own candidate for chancellor. With Horst Seehofer's bumpy change of hands, Söder had a difficult start as CSU chairman and prime minister, the wounds of the power struggle were still bleeding, modest polls depressed the mood, and a lot of negative prognoses rained down on him. But Söder does his job – even from the point of view of some critics – balancing and prudent.

The relatively strong election result of the CSU in the European elections gives him tailwind as well as the new polls. According to a survey by the GMS institute, 60 percent of those questioned now consider him a good Prime Minister, compared to only 49 percent in January. With the bourgeois voters of the CSU and Free Voters, Söder even achieved an approval of 79 percent each. In the Forsa survey on the popularity of prime ministers, Söder was able to increase the most with 49 percent compared to the previous year: At that time, only 31 percent of the Bavarians surveyed were satisfied with the work of the head of government. Söder beats with his growing support and the already strong potential of Bavaria now a green swath for his Berlin perspective. In view of the weakening values ​​of the CDU and an open question about the candidate for chancellor, he is increasingly taking the role of a conceivable option.

With Franz Josef Strauss in 1980 and Edmund Stoiber in 2002 there were already two Union Chancellor candidates from the CSU; Why shouldn't Söder become third in 2021 (it would be so far every 20 years)? In the European elections, the Union lost everywhere, just not in Bavaria. That strengthens his position. In addition, Söder has the right to veto nominations. The candidate for chancellor must be put together by the CDU and CSU. Söder thus has a major asset in Union personal poker from the start.

Especially if Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer's polls should remain moderate, his chances will increase. At 52 years of age, he can wait and see. And until then, define the Union's strategic line on the migration issue in the climate debate. Because that's exactly what he's doing this week. He presents the environmental program for the black-green federal government in 2021. Source: “He is Germany's most popular politician, President of the Bundestag and godfather of the CDU.

During this week of the party conference he pulls the strings – and keeps a door to the Chancellery open for himself. Wolfgang Schäuble looks directly at the Chancellery from his Reichstag office. “” I have everything in view, “the President of the Bundestag likes to say. On the wall hangs a painting by Jörg Immendorff with the title painted on it demonstratively pink: Creating daring. Both suit him. Keep an eye on the Chancellery and have courage in your heart. Especially this week. Political friends for years: Friedrich Merz and Wolfgang Schäuble. (Photo: picture alliance / dpa) After 18 years, the CDU elects a new chairman for Angela Merkel and that a new beginning is possible at all is due also to Schäuble.

At the beginning of October, before the state elections, he was the first top politician in the CDU to publicly address Merkel's end. She was “” no longer so undisputed “”, she had “” ruled for an exceptionally long time “”, “” major changes “” were imminent. Many in the Union saw this as the starting signal for Merkel's disempowerment. Friedrich Merz and Angela Merkel too.

Without Schäuble's intervention behind the scenes, Merkel would hardly have withdrawn and Merz would not have started, according to the Chancellery today. Schäuble has long been the Chancellor's most powerful controller – now he is shaping her successor in the background. His word has enormous weight in the CDU. And everyone knows that Schäuble favors Friedrich Merz on Friday.

Both have a long, trusting bond.